Take a look at this visual that showcases arms imports by country, across two time periods:
First up, the chart isn’t too bad. Fairly clean look, gridlines are in muted in the background, no duplication of Y-axis numbers and data-labels. The message – which is quite simple – is supported clearly when you look at the first red clustered column.
But let’s dig deeper. This chart shows two things:
The main message only reflects the first of these two aspects. If you strictly look at the message (India being the highest arms importer now), the previous 5-year period data is irrelevant.
So, here’s a tip – once your message is finalised, make the simplest chart possible to reflect that message.
If you just have to show the data to back this message: “India is the world’s largest arms importer”, you could either make a pie chart or as I prefer, a bar chart.
Apart from the ease with which the message is highlighted, notice one key advantage of the bar chart: the country labels are so much more easier to read (as compared to a pie chart).
Having said that, what if you want to show both – the split by country and the movement over time?
Sure you can – but then the message should reflect that. Let’s examine what’s happening with India’s imports over the two time periods… We realise that, even in the previous 5-year period, India was the largest arms importer; and has in fact consolidated its #1 position. Well then, why don’t we state that as our main message:
“India consolidates position as world’s leading arms importer”
What about the chart then? We could use the same clustered column chart, but with one small change: highlighting the main message, and pushing everything else into the background.
For some people though, the clustered-column chart can be a bit cumbersome to read, especially if you want to compare across countries quickly. Another option, when comparing two or more component (i.e. percentage share) pieces, is the stacked bar or stacked column:
The stacking allows you to see two things clearly
It does have a limitation as compared to the clustered chart though – identifying the component by country takes a little more effort (although, to minimise the effort, the legend is lined up in the bottom of the chart, in sync with the components).
Ideally you should focus on one key message per chart, but sometimes you have charts that throw up multiple messages; and it becomes difficult to decide which one to focus on. In that case, one of these following questions should help you decide
Having said that, if you are presenting to a neutral audience; or if the data is part of a report that will be read by a wide audience, you may want to highlight different messages from the same chart.
Normally I prefer to create a different chart for each message. But in this case, it is possible to show multiple (sub-)messages in the same chart. Remember however, to consolidate the ‘sub-messages’ into an over-arching big-picture message.
So, here goes an attempt to interpret what’s going on in the world of arms imports (at which I am a certified, wait-for-it, arm-chair expert):
(By the way, seriously, I have no clue of international geo-politics. Please do not base your decision of setting up a weapons manufacturing unit in Greater Noida based on the above.)
(China may not be a bad idea though).
Anyway, the idea behind showing this revised visual is to encourage you to show the ‘story’ behind the data, by using these ‘explainer-text boxes’ (where possible).
And so, to sum up the key tips in this post:
And finally, the next time you see a seemingly simple, arm-aadmi chart, look a little closer – you may just discover an interesting (geo-politcal) story that can be evocatively told.
*****
Featured image: By U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Denny Cantrell [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons
